Is there truly any justice in the novel The Stranger, written by Albert

Is on that point truly any justice in the novel The Stranger, written by Albert Camus?Is there truly any justice in the novel The Stranger, written byAlbert Camus? This is a question that natur all in ally protrudes throughoutthe novel, as it is not abundantly benefit what Meursault, theprotagonist, was, in fact, practice on trial for. At the beginning of thesecond part of the narrative, it is understood that he is put on trialfor the murder of an Arab however, it later(prenominal) comes to our attentionthat the murder was not the primary reason of his trial, and perhapsnot even an essential ane for that matter. The fact remains thatMeursault was undoubtedly put on trial, not for the murder committed,but for being the way he was unemotional through the eyes of caller,which was represented by the instrument panel.To the reader it seems only natural that one should be put on trial,not for their personality, but for the harmful acts that one maycommit to another person. Therefore , the idea is strongly implanted inthe novel, as well as the mind of the reader, that Meursault was puton trial for murder. Nevertheless, throughout the course of the novel,it becomes apparent that he was, as a matter of fact, not put on trialfor the murder of the Arab, but instead, for acting in such a stoicmanner. Being the honest, straightforward man he was, he answered allquestions in that same conduct. Once Meursault had been appointed alawyer, his lawyer inquired over the events of Mamans funeral.Meursault responded rather coldly when his lawyer had asked him if hehad felt any sadness that day, verbalize that he probably did loveMaman, but that didnt mean anything. At one time or another allnormal people have wished their love ones dead. (... ...(p. 96) Thisis a rather profound statement that affects not only the characters inthe novel, but the reader as well, rather intensely.Thus, it becomes palpable that society, in other words, the juryattempted to fabricate and impose r ational explanations forMeursaults irrational actions. The fact that he was sostraightforward and onest was disruptive and threatening to theirsociety as they were not wonted(a) to it, and therefore, they saw nomeaning, which would consequently create chaos in their orderly lives.Meursault appears to do as he pleases, when he pleases, and therefore,follows no pattern throughout his life, hence, society becomesthreatened by him, which ultimately leads to his execution.Bibliography1. Camus, Albert The Stranger. Alfred A. Knopf, Inc., New York, 1988. The Faade of the Trial Meusaults TRUE Accusation